A Case Study in Identity Politics

Pundits and commentators have made much hay out of the demographic trends in the Democratic primaries. This is really to be expected given the candidates and their policy. Never have voters had to choose between a woman and a biracial (yes, Virginia, Obama’s mother is white and from Kansas — it doesn’t get much whiter than that) man. Given the haphazard coalition that the Democrats have cobbled together to form a working majority, it would make sense that identity politics would take center stage, especially so in this historic election.

To further strengthen those politics based on race, age, or gender, Sens. Clinton and Obama do not substantively differ on almost any issue. As much as the “we’re the people we’ve been waiting for” crowd thinks their candidate is an outside-the-beltway reformer, his platform is essentially the same stale, center-left package that we saw from Kerry and Gore. This is why the ABC debate debacle occurred; asking questions on the economy, social issues, etc. doesn’t get ratings when the candidates agree on just about everything, not to mention the questions did need to be dumbed down for a network television audience. I recall Ralph Nader calling the 2000 Bush-Gore debates “a cure for insomnia”. The previous Clinton-Obama debates were no different. And come on — voters have had all the time in the world to figure out the issue positions of the candidates and make a comparison. Anyone still on the fence might as well flip a coin.

These wide demographic swings were to be expected given the Democrats’ consistent flirtation with identity politics and the lack of substantive disagreement on the issues. What else are voters supposed to use in order to make their decision given two practically identical candidates? Now, whether these rifts heal or not and the coalition regroups by November is still an open question.

Advertisements

2 comments so far

  1. Jeff on

    I think you’ve missed a few note-worthy news items over the last few months here.

    Dead?

  2. Paul Charles Harrison on

    Hahaha… This is as hilarious now, as it was back in 2008, before Obama won two national elections, and HRC is poised for two more. I am sure you are now aware of how your ramblings have been exposed for what they are; shallow and lacking of substance


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: